5 Responses

  1. Anthony Jameson
    Anthony Jameson
    April 25, 2010 at 7:59 am | | Reply


    “The part that makes Pompey’s situation so bad is the fact there is no consequence for what they have done. Sure, this is a club that’s got a point deduction, has had to sell off a number of players and has been relegated from the Premiership,”

    You say there have been no consequences, and then list several. What do you want to happen? A ceremonial with they guy with the silly hat and the drums put in the stocks for people to throw rotten fruit at him?

    “It’s especially not fair on clubs that act sensible and spend within their means because they can rarely hope for successes like Portsmouth have recently had”

    How many games did Crouch, Defoe, Kranjcar, Muntari, Diarra, or Johnson play in Pompey’s Cup run this season? A fair point for 2007 perhaps, but an irrelevance now.

    “Pompey had a lot of time to stay out of administration despite the fact it was always coming, and were unfairly able to delay a winding up order”

    The club disputes, in the High Court, the HMRC tallying of the sum owed. That isn’t “unfair”, that’s due legal process. It happens all the time – Cardiff, Southend and Notts County were all in Court the same day as Pompey last time doing exactly the same thing.

    “They’ve bent the rules for Portsmouth”

    Who’s “they”, and specifically, “how”? There is a legal process relating to the HMRC debt, which many clubs have been through lately, and there is an Administration process which so far has proceeded in exactly the manner required by the High Court, again as happens elsewhere.

    It really is illogical to say “the problem is with the League” (and no sane person would disagree with you) but claim that “the rules have been bent for Pompey” and demand that something is done about them.

  2. Rob McCluskey
    Rob McCluskey
    April 25, 2010 at 8:20 am | | Reply


    Theres no real consequences, its like the bank situation, they’ve built up all this risk and debt and in the end they’re given TV money early, allowed to sell players outside the transfer window and if any other company did that they would fold. Look at Chester and Farsley Celtic, they were in debt but did they get as much help? Nope, they both now don’t exist. Lots of people have lost their jobs while they pay Avram Grant thousands of pounds at the moment and all the rich people can just chalk it off.

    You’ve got clubs that are spending sensibly and know how to controll their debts and the fact that clubs in England can effectively self regulate themselves is ridiculous, just like with the banks again, you have no regulation then people high up are just going to build up even more risk and gamble more money and it just ends with people lower down losing their job and people having to pick up the cheque through their tax money. What they’re doing is basically criminal, they should effectively be put in prison for it.

    And the whole process of the wind up was a joke, other clubs are out paying their taxes and Portsmouth were a Premier league club and theres no way you can justify the fact they didn’t pay taxes but instead players are getting all that money. And then they turn up and theres just the excuse that they have new owners (for about the 10th time or whatever) so they need more time to sort things out and instead they’ll have to make a settlement which is too sympathetic.

    And “they” refers to The Premier League, they’ve handled the situation terribly, they badly need to regulate money in the game before English football goes to the dogs, the price of being in the league is ridiculous and you look at West Brom who have pretty much spent wisely but can’t stay in the Premiership because they don’t want to build up the risk.

    It’s horrible how administration is happening all too frequently, it’s almost a normal thing now. Clubs shouldnt be ‘too big to fail’ because it lets them get away with things like what Portsmouth have done.

  3. Sue
    Sue
    April 25, 2010 at 5:35 pm | | Reply


    Trading whilst insolvent is illegal. How come they were able to afford two players (loan fees etc.) in the January window when they already owed (to take just one example) over £10 Million pounds to HMRC?

    At least worried Championship fans will know at least one of the relegation berths will already have been booked: unless of course Portsmouth go pop after the FA Cup final or end up in the Blue Square after failing to get their golden share.

  4. Martyn
    Martyn
    April 26, 2010 at 4:25 am | | Reply


    Pompey never recieved their parachute payment early, they never even asked to. The press speculated what the Premier League might do to help one of its own and came up with this idea then the Premier League made inquiries into the possibilities that were immediately shot down by the other Premier League Clubs and that was it.

    Pompey were not allowed a longer time than anyone else to stay out of administration, it was their choice and no one elses just as other clubs choose to go into administration when they need to or want. Sulamien Al Fahim and Ali Al Faraj should have placed the club in administration more or less straight away but didn’t and continued to spend money they didn’t have and struggle with the debts. Balram Chanrai put the club in administration as one of the first things he did. It was a really bad decision from the two arabs to allow the club to stay out of administration for so long but even so it was always up to the club’s owner as to what it did.

    Pompey were not unfairly allowed to delay a winding up order. Pompey challenged the original ruling by the courts and went back to court for it, which was well within their legal rights to do, and upon going back to court the club was able to prove that it had interested parties looking to take over so the court ruled that the winding up order was to be delayed, which was again legal and fair. Those proposed takeovers didn’t happen and the club put itself into administration before the next court next, which well within their legal rights to do. The HMRC scrutinised the administration to a microscopic extent and decided that there was nothing wrong with it. The options at that point were administration or liquidation so I think the club chose the best option.

    As to the cosequences, what do you want to happen to Portsmouth? They’ve been docked points, they’ve had transfer embargo’s placed on them and I’m sure they would be fined if they had money to pay it and they look to be docked points next season and probably have another transfer embargo placed on them as well. These are the only real punishments that Pompey can recieve unless your a proponent of expulsion from the league or liquidation, both of which would not allow the creditors to recoup what were owed and would not punish those who caused the problem.

    Portsmouths problem came from Harry Redknapp, Peter Storie, Alexandre Gaydamak, Sulamein Al Fahim and Ali Al Faraj, all of whom will get away from this with no punishment. Gaydamak even looks set to get 30 million out of it.

    Why not direct your anger and indignation at the people who actully drove Portsmouth into heavy debt and to the brink of destruction? The club is as much a victim of the afore mention peoples rank bad management as anyone else is, perhaps more so becuase the club is facing the anger and indignation of such people as the column writer and have to struggle to clear the debts to keep in business while being pelted from all sides by the media, other clubs, fans of other clubs, pundits, managers and even Richard Scudamore who just want to kick the club while its down but say little to nothing about the men who put the club in the position its in.

  5. Rob McCluskey
    April 26, 2010 at 7:13 am | | Reply


    The fact is all these interested parties to buy the club were never going to clear the debts and it seems to me that there was a lot of transferring around so the club could have more time

    Like I said, people like Storrie shoudl be put in prison for what theyve done because its just swindleing a business for their own good. The fact is i’m blaming the league for allowing stuff like this to go on when it could be quite easy to regulate in truth, you can’t keep building up loads of debt or this always happens. This ‘appropriate owner’ thing they have now is also a joke and obviously is flawed, just looks at Notts County, how did their owners get in?

    Even when the club is in heavy debt theyre making awful deals such as the Begovic on, Avram Grant getting paid top dollar when it’s not necessary, whereas theres people lower on the chain who lose their jobs and the tax payers who are picking up the cheque now while Pompey will probably pay back 10p on the pound. It doesn’t really reflect the real world, because if Pompey were any other business they would cease trading now, whereas all the clubs are too big to fail, it’ll just keep happening over and over so more rich people at the top can make their money.

    And also in reference to the parachute payment early, I meant they recieved their TV rights money early, hope i wasn’t unclear about that!

Leave a Reply